jump to navigation

Random State Political Update December 5, 2007

Posted by fitsnews in SC Politics.
trackback

carpet world

NO LOCAL “CARPETGATE,” MORE ON PAYDAY LENDING LAWSUIT, WORKERS’ COMP “STONEWALL” & INEZ

FITSNews – December 5, 2007 – For the past ten minutes we’ve been investigating whether or not a carpet and flooring company that has made campaign contributions to state budget writers Dan Cooper and Hugh Leatherman was also the beneficiary of a statwide no-bid contract worth millions of dollars. Of course we also munched on some delicious red seeded grapes, took a long-overdue bathroom break and whooped the New Orleans Saints’ asses in a little Madden ’08 football while we were at it … making us talented multi-taskers, baby!

Anyway, despite some potentially questionable decisions benefitting this particular company by the folks over at the S.C. Procurement Office (part of the State Budget & Control Board), we’ve been unable at this point to uncover any evidence of a pay-to-play scam. That’s because according to the board’s spokesman Mike Sponhour, “there is no statewide corporate carpet contract,” and bids for carpet and flooring projects are administered by the individual agencies “on a job-by-job basis.” So yeah, for now we better just stick with the national “carpetgate” story.

PAYDAY LENDING UPDATE – We wrote recently about another lawyer-legislator shakedown in South Carolina, this one involving thirteen state legislators who stand to make millions of dollars by going after the payday lending industry in a series of class action lawsuits. Aside from the obvious potential for abusing the public trust, we were surprised to learn from a reporter friend of ours today that two of the State Senators who are pushing this legal jihad (John Hawkins and Vincent Sheheen) still sit on a committee that is charged with writing our state’s payday lending laws.

In fact, they’ve even heard testimony in the past from some of the same people they now represent …

Again, we’re not trying to become “payday lender defenders” or anything (although that rhymes rather nicely), but absolutely nothing about this situation strikes us as being even remotely on the level. It’s also remarkable how the mainstream media, particularly our own La Socialista, won’t write a word about this clear conflict of interest, but has devoted one-fourth of its editorial board to bashing the payday lending industry.

It’s a lot like the newspaper’s cozy relationship with the University of South Carolina, which pretty much consists of the school telling La Socialista to “jump,” and the newspaper asking “how high?” Seriously, USC could announce a plan to murder every first-born male in the state and La Socialista would probably write a glowing front-page article about what a great idea it was and how we ought to give them eleventy kabillion dollars to pull it off.

THE WORKERS’ COMP BRICK WALL – For the second time this year, South Carolina’s Workers’ Compensation Commission is refusing to respond to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests seeking specific details of awards and attorneys’ fees from their rulings, both of which are sort of important if you’re trying to determine whether or not commissioners are doing their jobs. Of course in addition to being important, these documents are also public record, or at least they’re supposed to be.

South Carolina’s Freedom of Information Act states that: “it is vital in a democratic society that public business be performed in an open and public manner so that citizens shall be advised of the performance of public officials and of the decisions that are reached in public activity and in the formulation of public policy.”

Sadly, acts of defiance like this remind us once again that the notion of transparency in government continues to be little more than a pipe dream in South Carolina.

INEZ IS KINDA HOT – This has nothing to do with anything, but we were strutting into the local Starbucks yesterday afternoon for our daily venti mocha frappuncino fix and happened to bump into former State Superintendent of Education Inez Tenenbaum. Who was looking pretty damn good, people.

Sure, we disagree with 100% of everything that’s ever emanated from her ruby red lips, but she’s got a brunette, older Meg Ryan “thing” going that’s definitely working for her. And she’s an impeccable dresser to boot. Hot for former Superintendent? You better believe it, baby!

Advertisements

Comments»

1. Billy - December 5, 2007

The State Newspaper has a bias, and it refuses to budge from it.

They love the cabinet, and hate the legislature…so do not expect critical coverage of cabinet agencies.

They love single payer government run health care…so do not expect negative coverage of Medicare or Medicaid.

They love public education and hate vouchers, so don’t…..well, you get the point.

Any “hungry” newspaper could easily have half the lobbyist and politicians in Columbia jailed by Easter…but the State lollygags along, living in LaLa land…proving the point that ignorance is truly bliss.

2. Harden Gervais - December 5, 2007

I love the ignorance people have about journalism. Anybody that’s been a working print journalist for any length of time knows that there is no bias, just situational conditions. The only bias reporters have is for a good story. It’s impossible for that many people to be “in” on such a suspected conspiracy.

But, keep those aluminum foil hats on, boys. It makes you look sexxxy.

3. Ron Turner - December 5, 2007

Thanks Billy for your observations. Especially “any hungry newspaper could easily have half the lobbyists and politicians in Columbia jailed by Easter.” I’ve suspected that and have often wondered if we’d ever have another U.S. Attorney with the kind of guts that Mcmaster had when he pursued “Operation Lost Trust.” I believe and apparently you do also that it’s long past time of “Operation Lost Trust II”, a sequel. It beats the heck out of me how we’ve had no meaningful ethics reform legislation since the aftermath of “Operation Lost Trust” around 1992.
Thanks,
Ron Turner
Summerville, SC

4. Pink Crustacean - December 6, 2007

Hey Ron, McMaster had nothing to do with Operation Lost Trust, that was Bart Daniels. McMaster’s big ‘contribution’ to criminal justice was Operation Jackpot that put a few drug dealing restaurant owners in jail in Charleston. But I do agree it is time for another round of inquiry. Perhaps with a AG or US Atty interested in more than the next political office to seek it just might happen!

5. jack abramoff - December 7, 2007

I think it will have to happen from the us justice department. it is mcmasters job to protect the domain/institution that is the quindom.

I think that quite possibly something is quietly happening now:

1. Robert Stewart leaving to start a private consulting firm…whatever

2. Ed McMullen leaving to start a public affairs firm…whatever who in the hell needs another republican lobbyist.

3. Doug Smith retiring to spend more time with his family?

4. Shirley Hinson retiring to take job at lowcountry graduate center…she is already working there.

Just keep watching, there is an investigation going on and I am sure that will folks will bring the news to us first.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: