jump to navigation

Standing In The School House Door November 2, 2007

Posted by fitsnews in SC Politics.
trackback

school house door

SPARTANBURG SUPERINTENDENT FORCING FAMILY TO PAY FOR SCHOOL DISTRICT’S MISTAKE

FITSNews – November 2, 2007 – It’s no secret that screwing up royally and passing the ever-escalating buck to parents and taxpayers is what public education in South Carolina is all about. In fact, rarely in the history of human endeavor has so much ever been invested to produce so little.

Of course, the notion of consumers “paying for the mistakes” of a bloated, monopolistic bureaucracy is seldom crystallized as clearly as it is in the case of Peyton and Presley Smith, twin sisters who attend Wellford Elementary School in Spartanburg, S.C.

According to reporter Bob Dalton‘s story in this morning’s Spartanburg Herald-Journal, the six-year-old twins are being removed from the public school they have attended all year today because Spartanburg School District Five screwed up its zoning lines last year. That is, of course, unless the girls’ parents cough up some cash:

“If you choose for them to finish the year at Wellford, you will be required to pay tuition of $1,700.00 per child for a total of $3,500.00,” District 5 Superintendent Scott Turner wrote in an Oct. 24 letter to Mark and Dabney Jackson, the parents of Peyton and Presley.

First of all, we may not be as good as some people when it comes to mathematics, but last time we checked $1,700 + $1,700 = $3,400, Mr. Superintendent. Second, and most importantly, what the hell gives you the right to so brazenly attempt to extort money from these parents? Especially when it was your people who screwed up?

Instead of admitting their mistake, apologizing to the Jackson family and allowing these two little girls to stay in school with their friends, District Five spokesman Barry “The Hammer” Reese is getting all Tony Soprano on the family.

“Because no arrangements have been made to pay the tuition, (today) is the last day the children can come to Wellford,” Reese told the Herald-Journal. “It’s possible that the district did make a mistake but the mistake was discovered, and we need to be consistent.”

Yeah, consistently asinine.

While this is obviously just one incident, Spartanburg Five’s zoning screw-up, inability to do simple math, extortion tactics and jackass attitude toward these parents is another compelling example of why school choice is desperately needed in South Carolina.

No parent should be forced to put up with this kind of garbage, and every parent should have the right to choose the educational setting that’s best for their child regardless of race, income or any other determining factor.

Our point? Remember this story the next time a blowhard supporter of our state’s worst-in-the-nation public school system tries to tell you that preserving their failed status quo is “all about the children.”

In this case, it’s about anything but.

Advertisements

Comments»

1. Scott - November 2, 2007

I can’t believe that an omniscient school district – one so enlightened as Spartanburg Five – could make such a drastic mistake.

While this may help Spartanburg Five enforce these silly rules, it certainly is not good for the education of these two children to be ripped out of the classroom like this.

2. Believe It Not - November 3, 2007

It pains us to agree with sic(k) willie from time to time, but we have to in this case. Cut the kids a break.

But, ya know, our pain in tempered by knowing the school district’s hard line stand is because of radical hard-line zealot’s and crazy’s (like sic(k) willie) who scream like a stuck pig anytime they think they can get an advantage by claiming the taxpayer is being cheated.

In this case, the school district is just following the rules that zealot’s like sic(k) willie demand when it’s to their political benefit.

Remember the news story about the kid bringing a “butter knife” to school to slice a banana because new braces made it hard to eat.

The poor child was hammered and went to jail. For a “butter knife!”

The school administration felt it had no choice because of wackos (like sic(k) willie) demanding “zero tolerance.”

By the way, your don’t hear the term “zero tolerance” anymore among intelligent people. Even the zealots realized the legal liability.

Fortunately, everyone knows sic(k) willie is not a “real person.” He is really a political consultant “wanna be.” And we all know that 99% of all political consultants make the others look like crooks.

3. Hmmm... - November 3, 2007

Believe it Not,

Were you born a jackass, or is it nurture?

4. Believe It Not - November 3, 2007

Hmmm, thanks for asking. Natural born with a little south side Chicago upbringing. But, also with a lot of “nurture” from wacko crackpots like sic(k) willie sure helps. Bet the next thing he’ll claim is vouchers would have saved these kids. You know, vouchers fix everything. They’d fix world hunger, tooth decay and global warming.

Bull, vouchers are a scam. 🙂

5. G.L. - November 4, 2007

This is ridiculous. I think it’s all about school officials’ egos. Seems to me that all these educrats are miniature “Mayors of Importantville.”


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: